| M | D | M | D | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Okt | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 | ||||
- Allgemein (14)
- BI/DWH/DB (3)
- Deutsch/German (2)
- economics (3)
- graphic (2)
- ITSM (1)
- mobile (4)
- net (11)
- performance (11)
- programming (13)
- science (7)
- security (5)
- storage (3)
- unix (6)
- web (20)
- 9.10.2009: Linux kernel report
- 9.10.2009: 60 GHZ ECMA-387 demonstrated
- 30.9.2009: File system
- 22.9.2009: Code Splitting for Network-Bound Web 2.0 Applications
- 22.6.2009: mobileHacking.org
- 20.6.2009: don't even need a keylogger...
- 8.6.2009: sourcing map
- 27.4.2009: Linux virus writing article by foobar
- 27.4.2009: PhoneGap
- 6.2.2009: CMDB and asset management
storage
The Register just posted an article about storage vendors claiming as usual the best storage array’s for Oracle DB. They actually made a failure by linking to Pillar instead of pillardata. I looked recently at Pillardata, they were founded with Lary Ellison backing them. Nevertheless they promise very good utilisation values and builtin QOS via the Axiom box. They use SATA drives and the performnace numbers they mention look quit well. recently they also introduced a smaller axiom box (300) for SME market. I don’t have actual price information, but I like the concept of higher utilisation. another box to look at is Atrato’s Velocity 1000. EMC’s DMX-4 is definitly in a different pricerange. They provide whitepapers with excellent numbers, but I remember that storagemojo explained the SSD products they actually use in more detail. He’s actually one of the consultants who talks about the numbers and offers (updated) pricelists. I follow his blog frequently